| Criterion 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management |
| Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership |
| 6.1.1 The institution has a clearly stated vision and mission which are reflected in its academic and administrative governance |
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.1.2 Effective leadership is reflected in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management. |
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment |
| 6.2.1 The institutional Strategic plan is effectively deployed. |
| • Strategic Plan and deployment documents on the website |
|
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.2.2 Functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc. |
| • Provide the Link to the Organogram of the University webpage |
|
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.2.3 Institution Implements e-governance in its areas of operations |
| • ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Document |
|
| |
|
| Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies |
| 6.3.1 The institution has a performance appraisal system, promotional avenues and effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching |
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.3.2 Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/ workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years |
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| • Details of the teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences, workshops etc., during the last five years (Data Template) |
|
| |
|
| 6.3.3 Average number of professional development / administrative training Programmes organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years |
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course ) |
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization |
| 6.4.1 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources |
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from government bodies during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) (INR in Lakhs) |
| • Any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.4.3 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) (INR in Lakhs) |
| • Any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.4.4 Institution regularly conducts internal and external financial audits |
|
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| |
|
| Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS) |
| 6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes, by constantly reviewing the teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes, at periodic intervals |
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
| 6.5.2 Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance: 1. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken 2.Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4.Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students 5. Participation in NIRF 6.Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA and such others) |
| • Upload any additional information |
|
| |
|
6.5.3 Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle NAAC A/A) Post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles of NAAC A/A)
|
| • Provide the link for additional information |
|
| |
|
